«

»

Oct 26 2016

Print this Post

A comparative study of the susceptibility of cut and uncut enamel to erosive demineralization.

A comparative study of the susceptibility of cut and uncut enamel to erosive demineralization.

Dent Mater J. 2016 Oct 22;

Authors: Lin WT, Kitasako Y, Nakashima S, Tagami J

Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the susceptibility of cut and uncut enamel surfaces to an erosive challenge and to examine the resultant characteristics/morphological changes. Ten extracted human incisors were used for preparation of enamel samples, and samples were immersed in citric acid. After 3 (total 3 min) and 6 cycles (total 6 min) of erosive challenges, surface loss (SL) and morphological changes were measured using scanning microscopy and FIB-TEM. Ca release (CA) and surface hardness (SH) were measured using a calcium-sensitive electrode and hardness tester respectively. Mean values of all measurements were statistically analyzed by using a t-test. Uncut enamel samples had significantly lower SL and greater SH than cut enamel (p<0.01). Cut enamel samples after 3 cycles showed higher CA compared with those from uncut enamel samples (p<0.05). Cut enamel was shown to be more susceptible to acidic dissolution and deeper acid penetration than uncut enamel after erosive demineralization.

[cite source='pubmed']27773896[/cite] – as supplied by publisher]