Tag Archive: EC

Feb 27 2019

Effects of Different Tooth Conditioners on the Bonding of Universal Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin.

. Effects of Different Tooth Conditioners on the Bonding of Universal Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):77-85 Authors: Sato T, Takagaki T, Baba Y, Vicheva M, Matsui N, Hiraishi N, Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Tagami J Abstract PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of different etching products used prior to the application of universal …

Continue reading »

Feb 27 2019

Effects of Different Tooth Conditioners on the Bonding of Universal Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin.

. Effects of Different Tooth Conditioners on the Bonding of Universal Self-etching Adhesive to Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(1):77-85 Authors: Sato T, Takagaki T, Baba Y, Vicheva M, Matsui N, Hiraishi N, Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Tagami J Abstract PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of different etching products used prior to the application of universal …

Continue reading »

Sep 02 2011

The clinical application of surface pH measurements to longitudinally assess white spot enamel lesions.

The clinical application of surface pH measurements to longitudinally assess white spot enamel lesions. J Dent. 2010 Jul;38(7):584-90 Authors: Kitasako Y, Cochrane NJ, Khairul M, Shida K, Adams GG, Burrow MF, Reynolds EC, Tagami J Abstract OBJECTIVES: Means of objectively assessing white spot enamel lesions (WSEL) are critical for determining their potential activity and monitoring …

Continue reading »

Sep 02 2011

A simplified quantitative test–adapted Checkbuf test–for resting saliva buffering capacity compared with a standard test.

A simplified quantitative test–adapted Checkbuf test–for resting saliva buffering capacity compared with a standard test. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009 Oct;108(4):551-6 Authors: Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Huq LN, Stacey MA, Reynolds EC, Tagami J Abstract OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to adapt a quantitative test for stimulated saliva, …

Continue reading »

Sep 02 2011

Comparative analysis of three commercial saliva testing kits with a standard saliva buffering test.

Comparative analysis of three commercial saliva testing kits with a standard saliva buffering test. Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):140-4 Authors: Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Stacey M, Huq L, Reynolds EC, Tagami J Abstract BACKGROUND: In 1959, Ericsson developed a laboratory buffer capacity test. Because the Ericsson test is not practical for use as a chair-side …

Continue reading »