Tag Archive: Dent Mater

Sep 19 2020

A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis

Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …

Continue reading »

Sep 19 2020

A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis

Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …

Continue reading »

Sep 19 2020

A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis

Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …

Continue reading »

Sep 19 2020

A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis

Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …

Continue reading »

Sep 19 2020

A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis

Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …

Continue reading »

Sep 19 2020

A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis

Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …

Continue reading »

Aug 29 2020

The effect of different light curing units on Vickers microhardness and degree of conversion of flowable resin composites.

. The effect of different light curing units on Vickers microhardness and degree of conversion of flowable resin composites. Dent Mater J. 2020 Aug 25;: Authors: Aung SZ, Takagaki T, Ikeda M, Nozaki K, Burrow MF, Abdou A, Nikaido T, Tagami J Abstract This study aimed to assess the influence of different light curing units …

Continue reading »

Older posts «

» Newer posts