Comparative analysis of three commercial saliva testing kits with a standard saliva buffering test.
Aust Dent J. 2008 Jun;53(2):140-4
Authors: Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Stacey M, Huq L, Reynolds EC, Tagami J
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 1959, Ericsson developed a laboratory buffer capacity test. Because the Ericsson test is not practical for use as a chair-side test, commercially available saliva buffering capacity tests have been developed for use in the dental office. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between a modified Ericsson test and three commercially available quantitative and colourimetric tests.
METHODS: Stimulated saliva (by chewing paraffin wax) was collected from 113 patients. Individual saliva buffering capacity was assessed with the following four different methods: modified Ericsson test; quantitative test using a hand-held pH meter; paper strip; or liquid colourimetric test. The correlations of ranking results among the different tests were analysed using the Spearman Rank Correlation Test, p < 0.001.
RESULTS: Spearman Rank Correlation indicated significant positive coefficients between the modified Ericsson test and the quantitative test (rho = 0.857), the paper strip colourimetric test (rho = 0.621) and the liquid-type colourimetric test (rho = 0.689).
CONCLUSION: The detection level of medium and high buffering capacity was test dependent. The quantitative test using a hand-held pH meter showed a stronger positive correlation with the modified Ericsson test. The qualitative tests seemed less reliable, particularly for patients classified as having a medium buffering capacity.
[cite source='pubmed']18494969[/cite] – indexed for MEDLINE]