Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …
Tag Archive: CR
9 19 2020
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …
9 19 2020
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …
9 19 2020
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …
9 19 2020
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …
9 19 2020
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …
9 19 2020
A competing risk model for bond strength data analysis
Dent Mater. 2020 Dec;36(12):1508-1515. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Sep 15. ABSTRACT OBJECTIVES: A competing risk (CR) model distinguishing adhesive, cohesive and mixed failures as competing events was used for the analysis of micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) data and compared with a conventional failure mode non-distinguishing survival model. METHODS: Fifty human molars were bonded using five …